Signal what is useful
A useful mark tells us which records deserve deeper document work.
Public Evidence Network
Follow only the places and issues that matter to you. Share a record, add a source or review one defined claim—without being presented as an endorser.
A useful mark tells us which records deserve deeper document work.
Send the controlling record—not a screenshot or unsupported summary.
Choose a state, role, issue tracks and the frequency that fits you.
Submit a permit, docket, hearing, agreement, dataset or correction.
START WITH ONE SIGNAL
PERSONAL EVIDENCE WATCH
The matrix keeps a resident following water in Texas separate from a reporter following utility dockets nationwide. That means fewer generic emails and more relevant records.
PRIMARY-SOURCE INTAKE
Permits, public hearing notices, utility dockets, site plans, tax agreements and water records are most useful. Tell us exactly what the source shows.
DEFINED REVIEW ROLES
Choose a bounded task. Reviewing one extraction or correcting one term does not imply support for every page or policy position.
Surface agendas, project signs, permit numbers and hearing notices that are difficult to discover nationally.
Send a local update →Use the data, preserve the source boundary and tell us which fields would make reporting faster.
Open reuse tools →Reproduce a match, review a field definition or challenge an interpretation with a stronger source.
Offer a review →Check one permit, equipment extraction, utility term or regulatory distinction within a defined scope.
Review register →WHAT WE PROMISE
Before publishing a contributor’s identity, we provide the exact wording, role, page and affiliation that would appear. Silence is never consent.
Public sources are verified before inclusion. Submitted contact information is not published, sold or used as an analytics identifier.
Material corrections remain visible in the correction and version log.